Re: Off-topic demand in Meta to ban users for their opinions chills free speech.
[...important information; i'm useful idiot and because of me ukrainian children dying...]
Yet there is little to no censorship — either by Western states or by Silicon Valley monopolies — of pro-Ukrainian disinformation, propaganda and lies. The censorship goes only in one direction: to silence any voices deemed “pro-Russian,” regardless of whether they spread disinformation. [...]
Yet there is little to no censorship — either by Western states or by Silicon Valley monopolies — of pro-Ukrainian disinformation, propaganda and lies. The censorship goes only in one direction: to silence any voices deemed “pro-Russian,” regardless of whether they spread disinformation. [...]
All italics are Greenwald’s. Highlighting is mine.
[/quote]
Of course there no need for "pro-ukrainian" (I laughed a lot, this is like "pro-victim propaganda", total nonsense) censorship, since Ukraine is great in curing some misinformation by it's own. Unlike russia. So it's obvious we need to help russia with this
For example: ombudsperson Lyudmyla Denisova was fired because a lot of disinformation she provided to Western society. Fired by ukrainians.
"He also accuses her of having focused too much on media work, and on describing sexually motivated crimes in gratuitous detail as well as the raping of children in occupied territories. However, some of these accounts, he said, had not been verified, which had harmed Ukraine's reputation and distracted media attention from other, proven crimes and problems."
Can you give me an example from russia, eh? Of such "self-curing against misinformation". I'm waiting.