Funds were frozen because their risk was Stolen 100%
Based on what/whose analysis? The coins came directly from ChipMixer, meaning it is
impossible for you to say they are 100% anything (unless you are the first person ever to be able to break ChipMixer). You have absolutely no idea where those coins came from, and claiming they are "stolen 100%" is nonsense.
Your terms of service say the following:
The user has the right to receive the results of the audit and/or independently verify the correctness of the risk assessment.
I would like to see the results of that audit, who decided the coins were "stolen 100%", and how they reached that conclusion.
Victim? It's funny. High-risk funds are sent to me, but you call the sender a victim. I can not believe this.
No bitcoin is inherently "high risk". If
you arbitrarily decide that some bitcoin is high risk and you don't want to accept it, then you return it to the customer and say "No thanks". You don't keep it for yourself.