You guys are missing the bigger picture. Solar panels have the variable cause the dependent on the sun lit in its way to provide power. This makes it become tricky to make it an energy source for stable 24/7/365 day, all season in EU country. The movement or green deal behind it quite not close to what it stood since waste from the battery, from the used panels, from maintaining upkeep doesn't worth what it can give back. I rather have EU haste its plan to renew and build the new nuclear plants.
But in countries which have hot weather and the sun is up for approx 12 hours a day installing solar panels is a very good investment.
In subcontinent - particularly in India - the gov is providing subsidy for installation of solar panels. And also it is good for the those who consume lot of electricity. Those who made investment in early days have made decision.
This initiative of having solar panels is very good because it would be using clean energy, and it would be a good additional support for the normal energy consumption that exists depending on the country, where I live, electricity is generated by hydroelectric and thermoelectric power, I know that others countries use nuclear energy, which is the cheapest energy but it represents a great environmental danger, however for us in my country, acquiring solar panels is a very large investment, if the EU has a certain type of help for its inhabitants of Acquiring cheaper solar panels would not be bad, it would be helping the planet, I do not see it wrong, in any event it is good to have these backup systems.