All that text but not a single word about how a person can utilize bitcoin without dumping it to someone else. Hahaha.
I answered this, you just lost at your own bs game, you werent even good enough to construct a bs test that Bitcoin cant pass.
And then to your ridiculous requirement. A person with 10 Bitcoin could also split their Bitcoin into more different addresses, than a person with 0.1 Bitcoin. So they could sign more messages on different Bitcoin addresses, for whatever purpose this serves, but its more utilisation. They can also make more transactions before running out of Bitcoin, than a person with less Bitcoin, so again they can utilise it more. With more Bitcoin they can also open more/ higher funded channels on different networks like lightning, which actually influences how many transactions they can route on this other network, because they provided higher liquidity, giving them more income from routing in the other network.
Theres many examples of how a person with more Bitcoin gets 100 times more utility out of it, without having ever touched a Bitcoin/Fiat market.
Let me simplify for you: there are two friends. One just gave a car to get 2 bitcoins. The other gave a couple of dollars to get 0.00001 bitcoin. The first one comes to you ask: "what utility can I get that will be 200,000 bigger than the utility that my friend will get if no one wants to buy our bitcoins?"
That's a simple practical question. What is your answer?
- If you have 200.000 more addresses, you can cryptographically sign 200.000 more messages on different funded addresses.
- You can send out 200.000 more Bitcoin inside the network, you dont need a buyer to send something, you can send to any address without anyones permission.
- You can store 200.000 times more Bitcoin in a permission-less, unconfiscatable way.
- You have collected 200.000 times more Bitcoin.
- You can open 200.000 more channels on lightning for example, if you each fund them with the same amount.
- You can open a channel on lightning with 200.000 times more liquidity, giving 200.000 times more liquidity to the other network.
No single Bitcoin sold, yet a utilisation of 200.000 times more.
That's not utilization. That's a waste of time. Sending "0.0001" 200,000 times to someone provides no utility to the sender, but quite contrary - he must spend resources - their time. The same is true for opening addresses and channels. So, the guy gave up his car, and in addition to that he must gave up his time on performing useless activity. And this is how bitcoin provides utilization to the guy. Hahaha. You are literally out of your mind.