I would like to see a more detailed analysis to see how they justify their conclusions.
http://joxi.ru/ZrJoxGqCQ4v9pmIf there's a chance for the funds to be "high risk", why can't the user first confirm they aren't and move onto depositing to your exchange right after?
Maybe we will add this feature in the future
Can you shed any light on where you decided to use a 10% figure confiscating user funds? I mean, why not raise your percentage to 50%, 100% or even drop it to 5% or zero?
We relied on statistics
Just wondering, if user bother to provide evidence they use ChipMixer (or other mixer),
1. Would you allow that user to use OpenChange?
2. What proof do you accept? Screenshot of their browser?
The crypto exchange demanded to block this client.
All possible evidence, including screenshots, is accepted for confirmation.
As I said before perhaps we will revise our rules regarding AML and additional fees.