So that is why that you should not trust people's definitions of the word "criminal" apart from an official government statement
I wouldn't trust that either. There are governments in the world who enforce capital punishment for LGBT individuals, for speaking out against the government, or for drinking alcohol. And anyone thinking "Well, that would never happen in the West" - there are various US states which now criminalize woman seeking healthcare and providers for providing that healthcare. Governments are not the arbiters of morality or truth, and Wasabi (and their blockchain analysis buddies) certainly aren't either.
Then whenever someone is accused of having dirty coins, they can pull up a screenshot of this site and it will be 'word against word'.

This is not a bad idea, especially when we consider that many entities which buy in to taint analysis do not have the slightest clue as to how taint analysis actually works or how the whole thing is (bad) guesswork.
Even better if you can add some history: "parts of these funds were mined in the years 2012, 2014 and 2018". All 100% clean, of course

Either that or go the other way to highlight the stupidity of the whole thing. "Approximately 2% of the coins in this output were once used in a casino, and have transacted through 592 addresses in over 10 year since then!"