You misunderstood what I was trying to say here. I clearly mentioned that it's never a good idea to submit fake documents for the reasons that you specified, but I can understand why they submit them despite all the risks involved.
Also, it's common sense to only provide your KYC to trustworthy sites like Roobet, Stake etc.
Submitting your KYC documents is really risky and I would never do that as your privacy is in your hands and I am not comfortable with it but if you are submitting for playing then go through legit manners as these casinos have strict policies to freeze your account if they found something suspicious in your documents.
Depends on the idea of what you are sharing. If you are sharing your own picture, your ID and all of that then maybe you wouldn't feel that comfortable with it. But, if you are sharing your address and name, literally just text and no image, then you may want to believe that it's fine.
Or maybe you would not want anything at all, who knows? This is why I believe that we shouldn't really be believing that KYC is bad for everyone, some people are fine with ALL kinds of KYC and they do not mind at all, some people are fine up to certain levels of KYC and not fine with the rest, and some people are against all kinds of it. This is why there isn't a guaranteed thing that covers all people.
People are indeed different when it comes to this manner on which there are who are just fine with these kind of verification or KYC since they do know that they arent really that bothered when it comes to
their information and personal identification or something relates to this.We know that level 1 kyc of roobet isnt really that much of a concern and you could always make use of false information
but its not recommended but if you are just playing on small amounts then it wont be bad on having this way.
Most of the time people doesnt really like KYC and this is the main reason on why crypto gambling had boomed that much because of this reason.