The negative trust on paperwallet here is bullshit..
He didn’t pay for any specific outcome or votes, he only said he would pay/raffle for participation..
Why? I can imagine because most are afraid to step up and criticize fortunejack, because fortunejack is the money tree, the hand that feeds many sig posters..
And with its campaign manager, completely biased, running around giving negative trust to users for criticizing fortunejack!!
(What a shitshow of trust enforced censorship, hamputz)
With such extreme and obvious conflict of interest, how brazen does one have to be to even contemplate such?
How dare anyone speak against fortunejack!!!
Paper wallets ratings are a mess too though, so lol y’all have fun..
Thks for participating in this thread. I agree that the trust system is not really about trust, it's just a marketing tool, destined to give exposure to the organisations sponsoring this forum. Unfortunately, a lot of them are scams, and I fell for one of those that is FortuneJack.
That's why I'm also using this "trust system" to try to show to others what it is really about, but that has limited exposure of course because most users of this forum won't read it and are exposed to scams.
Well, it may not be hard to become inflated when so many line up to kiss the Sir’s feet..
Thank you Sir Hhampuz. … Thanks for the privilege given and opportunity.
Hahaha good one, I wouldn't have read that if it was not for you.