~~~
So to answer @Sithara007, CONMEBOL teams have a chance of 63.3% of qualifying to World Cup which is x2 European teams chances and x3.5 at least the rest of the world chances which is ridiculous and unfair imo regarding that this competition is dintended to allow most countries of the world get a chance to qualify and play internationally vs other teams in different continents. Otherwise, UEFA could pick 22 best teams + 10 CONMEBOL ones and they form Bi-Continental Cup that would way better to watch than current World Cup.
What makes WC (World Cup
) good is when you see surprises and weaker teams advance instead of favourite bigger ones.
So to answer @Sithara007, CONMEBOL teams have a chance of 63.3% of qualifying to World Cup which is x2 European teams chances and x3.5 at least the rest of the world chances which is ridiculous and unfair imo regarding that this competition is dintended to allow most countries of the world get a chance to qualify and play internationally vs other teams in different continents. Otherwise, UEFA could pick 22 best teams + 10 CONMEBOL ones and they form Bi-Continental Cup that would way better to watch than current World Cup.
What makes WC (World Cup
) good is when you see surprises and weaker teams advance instead of favourite bigger ones. It is unfair to the CONMEBOL teams given their quality. They are a hundred times better than any of the AFC or CAF teams. Do you really think that the top teams from AFC, such as Saudi Arabia, China and South Korea would stand a chance against the weakest teams from CONMEBOL (Bolivia, Venezuela.etc)? Anyway, I am OK with the current allocation, in which 6 teams come from CONMEBOL and 16 from the UEFA. Other confederations still have 26 slots between them and there is no point in complaining.