My opinion on the tiny bit that seems to have sparked the "attack between a few reputable members" which is "The proof of Royse's conversations with Lucy", in my humble opinion such proof has little to no value, at least, it shouldn't be the backbone of any conclusion someone arrives at. Royse could easily fake a few conversations dating back to any date they chose, even the blockchain transactions could have been set up, there is no way in hell to know for sure if there was another person with the name of Lucy who is/was not actually Royse777.
So that leaves us with only one option and that's what Royse claims, it's either you take Royse's for it or you don't, if you think Royse was Lucy all along and then a few "screenshots" would change your mind -- I think there is something seriously wrong with your judgment.
And to put the little doubt about me/anyone else having the slightest opinion that Royse could have been Lucy all along without anyone knowing, Yes! that's very possible, butI guess that'd have made it much more easier for him to pull the plugged way very early at the first set of issues, since he'd have known there wasn't going to have been an easier way forward for him if he was the one bankrolling the casino, he could have falsely called Lucy(himslef) out and not so many people if at all anyone would have thought of the possibilities of him being the same person right ?
Personally, I believe Royse is a genuine person, maybe she got a bit greedy and saw a "huge opportunity" which she didn't want to lose, which led her to ignore all the obvious red flags which then resulted in a loss for everyone who was involved, one might say that her judgment is not to be trusted and that would make sense, but again, I don't think she had any intention to cause damage.
I slightly agree with greed notion, but I guess they benefit of doubt could have been for a fact that the casino is very new and needs a bit of time function fully and as Royse claimed he wasn't fully aware of every issue at the very instant might be part of what actually happened but I strongly doubt it was solely greed that got the better of him, going by the little conversation I've had with (minimal) and it was much about gambling pools and stuffs like the Covid-19 raffle which participated him.
What I find very ironic is that most of the users bashing him (not the sock puppets) would still finding comfortable with trading him without the fear of getting scammed ? Why then would they want new projects or to be wary of him, despite having admitted and owned up to his mistake, almost 8 years in the forum and what he's contributed so far should all count for nothing ?