had a "net zero" emissions goals for England
Not all conservatives come up ridiculous ways to interpret what Scientists around the world are claiming so that it benefits them personally like they do with the bible. Tackling the climate change problem translates to more stability long-term, which, is actually a conservative value.
The climate is in fact changing over the long term, but that doesn't mean that it is being caused by humans, that there is anything that humans can do to stop/reverse it, nor that it will result in harm to the ability to inhabit the planet. There have been multiple cycles of climate over long periods of time, for example, many years ago, there was the ice age.
Measures to "fight" climate change are really a means to make the West weaker economically and militarily compared to China.
Yes, this is the ridiculous view that many Republicans have and is in direct conflict with the view of the overwhelming majority of the most qualified Scientists around the world that I was referring to.
It is caused by humans.
It will result in harm to the ability to inhabit the planet.
There is lots humans can do to make it less bad.
And, by the way, China has taken big steps to meet their goal of being carbon neutral by 2060 (just 10 years after lefty boris promised) and has been the biggest investor in renewable energy for almost 10 years now.