Hi guys.
Firstly I’d like to thank Poker player that has notified me about this thread, LoyceV, you should have do it instead of him, but anyway, no matter about it.
I’ve reached an agreement for a management of signature campaign with shaker finance and I’ve funds for other 3 weeks of campaign.
As now, situation is changed, I see that shaker finance has a big red flag related to “potential scam” project that could be since his way of manage users, I’d like to let you everyone know that I’ll close campaign within this evening and will refund funds to the owner.
I don’t want to hurt everyone, and if someone risks to be scammed because of signature, I consider that closin it would be the best option in way to protect everyone.
I’m goin to take this decision now because I see that today many things has happened and I prefer to not work with this kind of business that risks to hurt my reputation built in 10 years.
if you keep the funds for three/four weeks of the campaign, then it is safe there and there is no possibility that the participants will be cheated and not paid, right?
also, the red tag which Shaker_finance received is still not based on the fraud that happened. even though he has a sordidness language, this should not mark him as a scammer.
I would say that the decision to close the campaign is probably not completely founded.
My opinion weighs, like any other forum participant, no doubts, yours doesn't, because it's not correct. I don't care who are those members, in real life they're for sure just bunch of losers and I drive car worth around 150k$ lol
Actually negative comments swap is solution why not, at least it will have effect on their profile
I didn't start that, they did
most of your problems arose because you performed in a horrible manner. halfway through the thread, you accepted the criticism, started showing signs that you would improve things, and hired a PR manager... now when the manager has cancelled your campaign, you are going back to the old regime, and you call other forum members losers
and all sorts of other nonsense.
building trust is no longer a "matter of time"?