What goes on now is that mixer tries to start working and some of the for sure weird participants of the forum don't want it to work because they think it's not worth to be trusted, without reasons, just simple judgement. I consider that absolutely abnormal, you may say that any mixer is not trusted because you only think it's not trusted
Signature campaign is more about marketing, yes we want to become trusted mixer and we make company to look trustworthy, that's normal. We ordered company for 1 month for now
You should have came into this with a completely different attitude and a lot more research..
Yep, I agree. The general attitude most bitcoiners have (or should have IMO) is that a service like this should be considered untrustworthy until proven otherwise, especially with the claims Shaker_finance has made and also
how he made them. Insulting critics/skeptics in the scam-filled world of crypto isn't the right way to go about convincing people you're legit.
As far as the claim that people are only posting criticism because they're in a sig campaign is wrong, for one. Those members could just as easily post idiotic praise instead of thoughtfully picking this mixer apart. It's also hypocritical if Shaker_finance also has a campaign running to promote his own service (as mentioned by OP; I haven't looked in the Services section).
I don't know if Shaker_finance is brand new to the forum or not, but it seems like he is, as anyone who's been here would expect to be challenged after making all of those claims. And to him I say it's nothing personal, because he's obviously taking it that way. It would be far better to answer the skeptics with data than defensiveness.