I have a wee bit of an issue with your middle portion.... even though there may well be a certain amount of technical truth to the fact of being in profits is merely a matter of degree.. sure you might feel more in the don't give a fuck angle because I am speculating that your BTC are like sub $100 on average.. maybe I am wrong.. somewhat.. so in that regard, there is like 200x in profits... but someone like me only has around 20x in profits (since I like to theoretically characterize my BTC costs as $1k-ish per BTC).. 

I do have tools tentative formulas to deal with relatively lower prices when measured in reference to the 200-week moving average, so in that regard, it seems that I am currently preferring BTC prices that are 12% higher or more than the 200-week moving average.. I am still working out my formulas.. and sure maybe at some point, I might be able to more psychologically transition myself into a not giving a fuck kind of perspective.. and maybe even use the 300-week moving average instead (or some other measurement) to make it easier to not give a fuck, even when the BTC price had spiked as low as 20% below the 200-week moving average but also staying 10% to 15% below the 200-week moving average for the best part of a month, so far, even though in the past 12 hours or so, it does appear that we are getting closer and closer to 200-week moving average parity with BTC spot price. .. it just still seems a bit on shaky grounds.. .

Even in 2015 our spot price spent close to 8 months right around the 200-week moving average . but in 2015 BTC spot price was also mostly above the 200-week moving average.. even though it did have a couple of fairly short-lived spikes below the 200-week moving average... it could be true that overall we may end up having to move off of the 200-week moving average as our bottom indicator.. but just like I am still reluctant to pronounce stock to flow as dead, I am also reluctant to give up on the 200-week moving average as a potentially reasonable bottom guide... fix (tweak) my tentative formulas?  perhaps? perhaps?


Philip Ma is a bot's bot.



You must not know nuttin.


You are responsible for your own posts.. not some random asian member of "our" community.


In other words fuck crypto and shitcoins.. unless you are making a certain point, remember the topic of this thread?  helrow?


I suppose that with enough money, there can be quite a few ways to build nice and useful Armageddon bunkers.. so maybe on the outside they might appear somewhat modest but then have a lot of scheme behind them - part of the difficulties, of course, would be that luxury does likely want to have indoor and outdoor space.. so not really easy to hide - and likely if Armageddon really comes, there are going to be normies wanting to plunder...   

Armageddon does not seem fun no matter how it is framed, and some of the protests around the world are really seeming to show that there might be no where to hide.. if the imbalances are not really figured out how to make sure the masses are sufficiently happy.. and maybe they are not any worse than historical disruptions and we are ONLY seeing more images in recent times because media (the internet through normies) is getting to all nooks and crannies of the world.. and even if some countries might have historically had city wide protests, they might devolve into country-wide protests causing no one to really be safe.