One ended up being too hostile and decided not to co-operate me. I was asked to KYC him (my hands are still tied and considering the situation it will be for good) because he was threatening to kill the CEO and confirmed hiring professional killer from darkweb. He denied even after I had evidence of the conversation he was posting in his private social channels to his audience.
why do you still insist on KYC in order to repay deposits? what is it for?
as far as I've seen Bitlucy is dead, and the website is offline. so there is no one behind it, to whom KYC is actually shown?
I understood that KYC verification was requested for the return of the deposit, correct me if I'm wrong.
In the feedback page we do not have option to create discussion. Following that setting, whatever comment left on the feedback page - if anyone wants to defend then they usually create a new thread or continue in any existing thread which is related to the case (like this thread). I did not want to hijack
the topic to post off-topic.
Creating a new thread and locking it, it's kind of bad practice. especially when you criticize someone a lot.
this topic (started by you) is quite enough for your feedback/reference to yahoo, you always can point a reference link to your post here.