Right, but you already created a thread, why not leave it open instead of making people look for context elsewhere? Now here's what happens: someone sees a trust rating on yahoo, they follow the reference link (possibly months/years from now when the memory of this current dispute has faded), and there is only your opinion in a locked thread. That's kinda misleading. It would be more fair to leave it open at least for a couple of pages so that yahoo and/or others can respond, then you could lock if it starts getting off rails.
I hope you will consider the annoying users like JollyGood and some others who will give their everything to make the reader to forget what they read in the main reference post after reading two pages of conversations if I unlock the thread. Besides the post is full of references linked to various posts. If anyone is genuinely interested then they will take the time to visit the some of the links.
However, if yahoo has anything to add then ask him to apologize first for saying misinformation about me (If I could be disrespectful to the trust system then I would ask the apology in the same fashion). Then I will give him a chance to reply to the topic (only for him) before locking it again so that JollyGood does not get a chance to write their nonsense arguments to mislead the reader.