- what percentage of the Bitlucy company given to Royse777?
I think it was 10%.
I believe I read another member quoted 10% but did Royse777 ever state the percentage voluntarily? I tried searching but that part remains elusive.
Let us say for example it is 10%, did Royse777 ever she state what Bitlucy as a company would receive in lieu of giving Royse777 that 10%? After all, if it was the CEO who held 100% of the company but he surrendered 10% of his holdings, what was Bitlucy going to gain from it?
- was there any paperwork signed between Royse777 and the Bitkucy CEO transferring that percentage over?
Paperwork on the internet? Unlikely.
If there was a registered company called Bitlucy or a parent holding company that owned Bitlucy, then in order to be given 10% of that company some form of paperwork had to be exchanged. If there was no paperwork exchanged between Bitlucy and Royse777 and no contract was signed, exactly how did Royse777 gain 10% of the company?
- what was the full name of the Bitlucy company with LLC, LTD etc?
As far as I know, this is unknown. That's not necessarily a bad thing, I've seen enough anonymous entities to know they can be good trade partners in crypto. But anonymous people should for instance never ask for KYC.
Agreed.
- what is the current legal status of the company and the legal jurisdiction the company falls under?
Unknown.
With no Terms of Service, no Terms and Conditions and no Privacy Policy it will impossible to know what the company stood for before it scammed and shut down. Without those details it will be impossible to know if any clauses were inserted that allowed victims and others who wanted to start litigation (and in which jurisdiction).