Quote
hat’s why Bitcoin system is not a payment system. And now, a fan fact. Not only that Nakamoto’s tokens cannot provide utility to their holders. But the holders cannot even show the tokens. All that they can show are numbers in their wallets that represent the amount of the tokens.
I have been doing freelancing gigs lately. Guess how people pay me? Through crypto [highlighted to help out edgycorner.. you can thank me later.]
Paypal has a 10% fee in my country, international bank transfer takes weeks, other payment methods are equally incompetent or riddled with unnecessary fees.
But bitcoins and crypto [highlighted to help out edgycorner.. you can thank me later.]? I get paid instantly, I can convert it to FIAT whenever need be or hodl or convert it into something more stable
Your arguments are flawed and outdated.
Fuck shitcoins.. we are not talking about shitcoins in this thread.
Do I need to highlight what you wrote? [ok.. I did. you can thank me later.]
? FYI: Bitcoin is a cryptoThere should be no real need for me to repeat myself on this point, and I am not claiming to be any kind of omniscient person, either...
At the same time, some of the burden remains on you (edgycorner) to consider your own ways of thinking and communicating about bitcoin-related matters, refusal to appreciate bitcoin's dominance and prominence (through language), and even your choices to get defensive (take matters personally) and to go on the offensive regarding such passion that you want to argue "technically bitcoin blah blah blah" nonsense).....
When I was pointing out bitcoin's utility. Look how you reacted. You probably didn't even read it until later
The burden is on you. You started with disrespect on something that wasn't even my point.
"Refusal to appteciate bitcoin's dominance"
Point where I said this. You are dumb man.