The topic makes no sense.  I honestly have no idea what the below means.

"Making law extend to make digital monies is just apply wire codes too."

Clearly that is not a coherent sentence.  Are you asking for a law to be implemented for Bitcoin double spends and saying that they have a law for this applying to wire codes?  I assume by wire codes you mean wire transfers?  Who knows?  You'll have to do a lot better than that for a thread if you want people to discuss something.  No clue what you were trying to do here or why you're bumping it.