I'd like to invite @Carrollzinha to share his opinion on why those users are still in your campaign even though they were found guilty and broke the rules?
♦️ If you receive negative trust while enrolled we reserve the right to check & kick you out from the campaign with no pay
♦️ Members with more than 1 account in this campaign will be kicked out with no pay
Is it because my DT power is not convincing enough, or whether 1 valid red tag can't really prove anything?
Maybe the second rules is limited to the use of alts in the Stake campaign only. User ‘Jeway’ have two negative feedback on his account now. Based on the first rules, Jeway should be removed from the campaign. I have asked the campaign manager about it, and she said this

Anyway, current week of Stake signature campaign will end today. I think Carrollzinha is going to take some actions today when this week will end. Perhaps, she is going to follow the first rule.
Just as it was said in that image, his first negative trust was kinda irrelevant as he had no other account in the campaign but at the moment he received that second negative trust, while he was inside of it, then he surely could not be kept.
As I previously mentioned in a few forum threads, we have someone only taking care of these cases (negative trust & edited posts) since we have had recently 2 guys breaking these rules inside the campaign so we were aware of that -2 of JeWay still on Sunday, which made things easier for us not to be paying him for one more week. Also I can't deny that Mahdirakib's message on Telegram got me surprised as I had no idea how big this issue could become.
Also, one more time, I want to thank you guys for still being around & helping us to keep not only our campaigns but specially the forum clean of such things.
And last but not least, my name is "Carollzinha", not "Carrollzinha" and I am "her", not "him"
