Unfortunately (but as expected, since scam is the bottom line of livelihood of many "trusted" members here), the scam promoter Royse777 only got 2 red tags among a ton of feedback on this matter.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. You seem to be implying that most trusted members scam for a living, and that simply isn't true. If you've got a personal axe to grind with Royse777, that's fine, but if you really believe that "many" trusted members on the forum behave unethically, perhaps this isn't the right place to spend your time.
I haven't been following this drama at all, and I just now read Royse777's post in his locked thread where he explained everything that went down between Bitlucy and him. Frankly, if he's guilty of anything it's being too trusting. And yes, it looks like he should have bailed on the project earlier than he did, but I'm not privy to the interactions he had with all of the people he dealt with, so I can't say I would have done anything different--nor can any of you, if you're being honest with yourselves.
I like this quote from bitmover in Royse777's thread:
I feel that here in bitcointalk all we have is our reputation. We take years to build it, and it may be lost at once.
IMO, there's no way in hell Royse777 deserves to have his rep destroyed because of his association with Bitlucy. Those trusted members who've gone rogue usually go the way of Master-P or those fucking idiots who misappropriated charity funds a while back, with b1ankcode (I forget his leetspeak username) being one of them. They just disappear into the night instead of taking the time to write a detailed explanation of their side of the story, and Royse777 did nothing of the sort.
All of y'all go look at yourselves in the mirror and stop slinging shit at the most convenient (but wrong) target.