I have once said before I believe last month that KYC shouldn't be a problem for gamblers if the casino is trustworthy and they still doing its best to keep the record intact which I believe is a sign of the casino's devotion to its users but I guess some people will still make a big deal while they can easily do it on centralized exchange whereas most of them lack good security and devotion this day.
KYC or not, like it or not, accept it or not, you decide.
Roobet does not decide it for you.
Honestly, this is what I always tell people and I am happy to see someone that understands that the KYC thing is something that's beyond the casino's power and once the casino Master license holder introduces a rule and regulation the casino must comply.
This is what I don't get to people, they are afraid to do KYC but they almost expose their whole life on social media. As long as the casino is reputable and you don't have criminal records that could alert the authorities then it should not be a problem complying on their rules. Criminals can't just use your identity if you limit what you post on the internet. Casino's usually just ask for your complete name, address, and a valid id to prove it. I don't think that is enough for someone to use your identity for their bad intentions.
Probably they still believe that cryptocurrency should remain decentralized which included being anonymous. We are in a different situation now, we all want the adoption to happen but in order to achieve that, we should accept that regulation is a key and with that said, expect that KYC will slowly implement later on. I'm wondering if those people really trust their banks, they think their personal details is safe with the bank well in fact, they are also selling that information.