
From the graph, it shows that in 2010 from a low of $0.09, it rose to $26.90 by 2.960%. fast forward to 2014-2015, we experienced a price dipping from a high of $1,238 to $687.50 then to $315.21.
This is a data is ok, but is the graphical representation of these days that is not ok, because just take a look at the graph you just post, the column of the price section is not uniform arrange, because the $50,000 price is supposed to be the middle of $0 and $100,000, but in your graph, the arrangement is different, because it is little things like this that makes a graph speak volume. Example below
