Re: I would like to address my negative trust feedback and apologise
But the code was the scripts on github buddy, that was all,
Fair enough. Although FWIW just because code is on github doesn't imply you can use it for what ever you want, you still need to follow the license 
And also, FWIW, just because OP made all of his repos private/deleted them, doesn't mean he's not still using the code without paying for a license. Which, appears to be the case.
the only parts that were in this discussione were some text elements on the homepage, that were simply close in meaning, not exactly the same at all. I meant something totally different too
You're making things worse, not better.
And that is indeed elements on the homepage, text elements like I said. How can I improve and get better if every single action I take it seems to be making it worse not better mate? Should I just leave it unspoken about? Me and my team made a mistake, I dealt with it and fixed it, as you can see, that section is not even there anymore. The designer used the words literally, when I said to take bustadice, which I am a fan of, as inspiration. It was my mistake for allowing it, but I am trying to make it better
This is the part that makes it worse not better: "simply close in meaning, not exactly the same at all. I meant something totally different too".
You didn't mean something different, you just copied them. It's obvious, why try to say otherwise?
Quote
How can I improve and get better if every single action I take it seems to be making it worse not better mate?
Stop doing those things that make it worse I guess. Acting like you're a victim here is one of them.I did say that that was the case, and the closeness almost exactness in the text is not permissible. We got that and are simply trying to make it better. No one on our side is the victim when we have come here, admitted to the mistakes and improved on them. And no, the codes are not used anymore, many martingale scripts as such can be used on our platform, but we did not just delete, as it would defeat the point