...
Did you miss the part where the Russia tried to take Kiev and remove the government and ended up having to retreat?
That 'part' only exists in the mind of people with a very limited understanding of warfare.
Even at the time it was obvious that the Russians had no intention of 'taking' Kiev. At the same time, NATO had to divert resources to face the Russians in the area since they couldn't be allowed to roam about freely. To many covert biological weapons laboratories and that sort of thing. So, it sucked Ukrainian resources away from the defenses of what the Russians did intent to take and keep.
This is actually pretty basic stuff. The Russians do seem to have had some hope that the entire country would collapse during the initial phases of the war and having control of some areas around Kiev in that situation would have been handy. They also seem to have been prepared with plans for multiple different scenarios...a concept which is alien to low-functioning people. For instance, if there were resistance in the North they would just pack up and leave, and that seems to be what played out. Shrug.
Of course... multiple scenarios. The problem is that "testing" the scenario costed plenty of RF casualties and exposed a severe issues with communications, logistics, discipline, moral, corruption... So you bought a ticket to win the lottery and failed. You are now worse off than you started and have demonstrated the world that you cannot really wage a decisive modern war.
That is without even counting the diplomatic backslash.