If your general thought on the forum is shared by a wider audience then it portrays the forum in a very bad light. I hope others do not see it as bad because the past positive conduct of someone cannot negate the negligence and scam of the present. Royse777 seems to have go off very lightly in this very serious matter.
I think there might be a few more red tags from users here and there as they discover threads about the Royse777/Bitlucy scam but most probably other DT members will not tag red otherwise it would have been done by now.
The deed is done, and Royse777 has already gotten that which he deserved
Ok thks for pointing that out, because this is what I want to show: Encouraging, getting involved in, and owning a scam organisation, is ok for the vast majority on this forum, which reflects itself on the trust system score.
It is ok because, if you've made some fair trades and deals in the past, so you've been honest to some extent, you get a green light to scam at least once on this forum.
I'm just making a summary of the general thought on this forum, and taking this case as a specific example.