The TL;DR is:
fillippone said:
Yeah, that's a fact. fillippone said:
If you find a positive balance in this client side generated pages, you are actually owner of the private keys, so you are legitimate owner of such balance, and nothing prevents you from transferring to your own wallet.
Which is true. Any key you generate is yours, whether that was generated before you or not. Even if your intention is malicious and start brute forcing millions of keys, they're all yours. It doesn't change that fact. And that's not how I or fillippone see it; it's the way the protocol sees it. If you have generated a private key, you can sign messages with it. You're, therefore, the signer and, ultimately, the legitimate owner of that key.
So, nullius would have to tag Satoshi, too. 
Attacking great Bitcointalk contributors out of nowhere seems to be a new pattern.
I've had the pleasure as well some weeks ago to "debate" whith nullius, when he whitewashed Putin's war and made up fake accusations against us.
How can such a knowledgeable person be so gullible and disgusting? Neither me, nor JohhnyUA, nor fillippone has done anything to him.
Write a constructive post and get attacked by nullius - who's next?
nullius is indeed a cunt ✔