Was there a prior disagreement between fillippone and nullius? That's how it usually works with him - someone tries to argue with His Holy Wordiness, and he goes digging for some nonsense he can turn into red trust. Otherwise there wasn't much of a reason for him to necrobump that thread.
As for ethics etc... red-trusting for imaginary thought crimes is some next level shit, beats nullius' regular "defamation" nonsense. Not that it matters much, he should be ~ed anyway.
I am generally against name calling and personal attacks.
I stated my opinion on the fillippone situation and I said that I think nullis is in the wrong. But I don’t think two wrongs make a right, and I don’t think calling anyone a “cunt” is going to result in anything productive.
It's going to result in an obvious fact being stated for the benefit of those who may not be aware of his cuntyness.