Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Bitlucy withdrawal problem, does this acceptable?
by
BitcoinGirl.Club
on 07/08/2022, 03:05:03 UTC
Weird, you lost $600 and didn't leave a tag (it doesn't matter if there are already red tags or not).

It was on telegram where CEO used the user @BitlucyCEO

Has notting to do with Royse777

I was contacted because I have a post here om bitcointalk where I seek crypto jobs. Was stupid pay some services for the CEO. He should then give me funds back.
Well it does not matter which employee or part owner of Bitlucy contacted you to work for them. Based on the facts as they are known thus far, Bitlucy was owned by two people: Royse777 and the Bitlucy CEO - therefore some would say it does have something to do with Royse777.
I am interested to know who are these some of them. A user who paid for feedback, a user decodx who is advocating for you and who else?

This is a perfect example of how you justify a case and hostage users with your red tag. You are pissed because Royse777 did not share you private information and ignored your unlawful demand. Now when JanEmil, a victim himself is admitting that Royse777 has nothing to do with it, you are advising him to involve Royse777. Are you saying for example, in a group of company if the chairman runaway with the fund resulting the entire company including their shareholders in loss, you are going to tag the chairman and all the shareholders? This is pathetic. You were the same pathetic against the user nemgun too. I would like others to understand your arguments are totally inappropriate which obviously reflects on the tag I left for you.