~
It is still pretty clear that you do not understand what plagiarism is, and even with Wikipedia you cannot comprehend the concept.
As I said before, plagiarism is not the same as copyright infringement, and since you like to quote wikipedia, here is a quote for you:
Plagiarism and copyright infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent concepts,[18] and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by courts.
It is plagiarism you are accused of, dumbass, not copyright infringement. Get it?
You admit metalcecco is your alt account, then why are you referring to yourself in third person?
There is too much fury towards Blokbro.
~
His intentions are good.
Dumbass!

First, be careful with the words "idiot", I have never offended anyone. I repeat metalcecco is my private account, Blokbro represents the project and the whole community (I don't understand where the concept is not clear to you and I don't understand the problem) The word "plagiarism" is referred to in conjunction with the violation of the Copyrhigt ... precisely we are talking that I have not committed copyright infringement and therefore this word "Plagiarism" cannot be used because it is related to copyright infringement. "Plagiarism - plagiarism occurs when a work is reproduced in whole or in part and its authorship is wrongly attributed to others and not to the author". So you are accusing it of plagiarism that it is not, and you are publicly defaming it causing a lot of damage .. also whoever exposed this article has inserted it in "accusation of scam" and here is another problem because the Blokbro project is not a scam ( if it is a scam you have to prove it by being concrete).