I'm sorry for my ignorance, but who do casinos even report on these high transactions? From what I see the countries that issue the licenses don't even have time to look at every transaction of a online casino, so I wonder what is the purpose of KYC if the owner of the casino is anonymous and also the casino has no headquarters? In the real world casinos have to pay tax and are constantly supervised by a specific government agency, so it makes sense for them to ask for documents when a person makes a withdrawal. but in the case of online casinos I think that governments or whoever is forcing online casinos to demand KYC from their customers is not doing the right thing... it would only make sense if the person made a large deposit and then withdrawn the deposit, in which case it could be suspected of money laundering so it would make sense to ask for KYC because if that person is involved in the theft of coins then the casino could hand over his data to the police. but to demand that someone who has made a deposit of 100$ or even 1000$ or 1 million dollars and throws everything and loses and is left with only 10,000$ but then wins 2 million dollars but at the time of withdraw having to do KYC? that doesn't make any sense. in what part of this would it be suspected of money laundering?
That $100 maybe
. Anyway, everything is suspected until they break certain thresholds but in your case, the KYC requirement must be because of possible fraudulent activity such as cheating or exploiting glitches suspicion, there will be some investigation but of course, if proven clean, the withdrawals will be released. That is just an assumption but thinking deeper, it is possible because the casino (not Roobet of course) is delaying the payment because they don't have the fund to pay out for it. That is the common leeway to delay payments and trigger an "investigation" that needs time to delay the payment of the user.