I think there should be a dedicated BitcoinGirl.Club vs JollyGood thread. Now it's spread out too much and harder to find the details.
First, let me remind you about
my guide to correct use of the Trust system. I'll start with BitcoinGirl.Club's tag on JollyGood:
Failed to pay starmyc $100 for the 2nd job.
In addition, the user used to be a scam buster (past) but now he use his earned reputation to process nonsense against the people he do not like, make others his hostage with the red tag, demands unlawful private information to share and protect his employers to secure his job. Do not take any tag left by him as good reference.
The
Reference link doesn't mention starmyc, so that part seems incomplete. If it's accurate, maybe you can make this a separate tag including proper reference link.
But, and that's the main point, I get the feeling you used starmyc as an excuse to create a tag for the second part, and I think the second part should have been neutral. This doesn't mean "that trading with this person is high-risk". Make it neutral. It could mean you don't trust his judgement, in which case you can exclude them (and try to convince others to do the same).
Remember this:
A major goal of this is to allow retaliatory distrusts and ratings to actually have some chance of mattering so that contentious ratings have an actual cost. If someone is obviously scamming, then any retaliatory rating should not last long due to the DT1 "voting", but if you negative-rate someone for generally disliking them, then their retaliation against you may stick. In borderline cases, it should result in something of a political battle.
Well I think you got your response in the form of a retaliatory red tag which is disappointing
And that's the next point I want to address:
JollyGood's tag on BitcoinGirl.Club:
BEWARE: BitcoinGirl.Club cannot be trusted. The accusations made against me are baseless and are part of a revenge ploy to post lies and then keep repeating them.
Not a surprise BitcoinGirl.Club did not leave red or neutral feedback for the Royse777/Bitlucy scammers but left me a revenge tag. Do not trust anything BitcoinGirl.Club says
I'm confused: who left the first negative tag? I thought BitcoinGirl.Club was the first. Then why does JollyGood call that a revenge tag?
JollyGood's tag looks like revenge to me: there's no Reference link, just an opinion that "BitcoinGirl.Club cannot be trusted". The Royse777/Bitlucy part seems completely irrelevant to me: you can't tag someone for not tagging someone else!
What happened to
Be the bigger man? Receiving a negative tag does not mean trading with the person who left is is high-risk, so it doesn't justify tagging them too!