⭐ Merited by dkbit98 (1)
I agree in separating two parts. But since there are no point (at least this is how I looked it) to leave one neutral and another red so I decided to have all at once.
The point is that it's more accurate 
Quote
It seems, starmyc really is established person in his life right now, happy with the job now, he does not care at all. But he expressed his regret
In my opinion, Lauda was too trigger happy on the red paint, and JollyGood goes down the same path. I especially dislike that this scares off good users, while real scammers will just continue with a new account.I'm sad because I spent quite some time to work on this stuff at the time and all I got is this bad reputation stuff.
I've discussed some of JollyGood's negative tags a few times (probably in Reputation), but gave up after it seemed futile. He must have had enough of it, and stopped trusting my judgement last May.
Why didn't you add starmyc to your Trust list? His feedback seems reasonable, and that would mean he'd be on DT2 when you're on DT1, and would even the playing field a bit:
A major goal of this is to allow retaliatory distrusts and ratings to actually have some chance of mattering so that contentious ratings have an actual cost.
I checked JollyGood's feedback on starmyc, and I'm surprised he tagged the user saying:Quote
When I asked for the source code he declined asking for more money. If I did not get the source code I would have to go back to him for every small tweak I wanted to make and therefore he would ask for more money again and again.
Meanwhile, his own Reference link shows he didn't ask for source codes, and it's unreasonable to expect free source codes after you pay someone for a freelance job.