Honestly it's hard to me to believe if the scam exchange changed their address for few times.

I can still believe the first address 0xf902aa3a62f9e28878129e1a8f1eb71e4fd7a88c is a scam address since Coiner_ have been tried it himself and proven if the exchanges using the used address. But your excuses saying the exchanges may update the new address when someone already expose the address, that's the part I don't really believe.

Even it's already 5 years old case, but it's still appropriate since someone can get banned due to his old post which mean forum rules isn't only for current year or when merit system was implemented.