I recently visited a land-based casino after a long time to gamble, have some drinks and enjoy live music with a couple of my good buddies. Not long after we settled in, we heard one of the casino workers yelling at one of the gamblers. He said, "Sir please you have to leave now. You come here every day and you keep losing. Please be considerate of your wife and your newborn babies." The backstory is that this particular man is a very popular gambler at the casino not because of his winnings but because he keeps losing. Despite his losses, he would return to the casino the next day to gamble. From the story, his wife had just been delivered with twins. I would later find out that the casino worker is his nephew.
If you were the casino manager would you fire the casino worker for interfering with your business or would you ban the gambler from visiting the casino?
The question would be much better if it was what if you were the owner of the casino and not the manager. The manager is an employee in all cases and can deal emotionally with the subject and agree to deal with the situation as a special case, and if I were the manager, I would prevent that man from entering if his condition worsened. At least I don't like him to get worse in front of me and to go somewhere else to destroy himself.
But if she is the owner of the casino, I certainly do not invest my money to take into account people's psychological and financial conditions. This is not my duty anyway. Everyone is welcome, and I have no interest in their situation and I do not want to know anything about them, and one of the terms of the assignment is to cancel all feelings with clients during work. Whoever wants to advise his relatives, let him do so outside working hours. Imagine you own a bar and every good customer gets drunk every night in your bar. You advise him to stop drinking alcohol because it is not good for his health. This would be the most failed investment ever.