Haven't you been participating in this thread long enough to at least figure out some kind of a summary about what the linked article means to you?
Do you take it at its face?
- why does the article have that title?
and then since you posted it in this here thread for our supposed "reading pleasure".... ... .. . what the fuck does it have to do with bitcoin, besides merely having the term "bitcoin scam" as a descriptor contained therein?
why are we going to trust you WatChe, if we have to click on a god-damned link in order to attempt to figure out what the fuck the article is even about (or trying to be about?)?
Do you have any clue, yet?
Do you believe the titles of any articles? what about the one that you linked for our supposed reading pleasure?
Are some source materials more credible than others? Is the source material that you choose to pleasure us with credible?
What is(are) the take away(s) of that article WatChe? or the reason for even posting that... "information" (loose definition)?
We need to bring our buddy (no not that buddy, the other one.. again.. loose definition of "buddy") in here....
Here is summary of what the
article says:
It's a story of a person who deposited 24k$ in some fraudulent cryptocurrency project.
He started with 240$ investment and was informed that his investment has gone up considerably.
He invested 24k$ and was informed that his investment is now 50k$.
When he asked for full withdrawal, he was told his investment has gone down to 23$.
"The fraudulent platform had suggested that he should embark on a lawsuit in an attempt to recoup the lost funds — but told the man he needed to send another deposit in order to fund the legal action.
Source."
Key Takeaway. There are are many attractive crypto investment schemes that lure in the investor's. Always make sure you are investing in some legitimate scheme's.
[quote author=JayJuanGee link=topic=178336.msg60718558#msg60718558 date=1660020095
Your forum registration date says January 28, 2020..... .. that's more than 19 months..... no? Enough for two babies, right
(and even a bit of a rest period in between)? if my calculations are correct.
[/quote]
Damn, you figured it out correctly.