My opinion is that this thread should not have been made and is just complicating the path to the facts of the situation you have made the OP about..
You OP are accusing JG of scamming a coder for dust..
If you are wrong then his feedback on you is correct..
Do we think JG scammed a coder for dust?
That is the question..
This topic is a very strange way to present the situation that's for sure and doesn't really make much sense (especially now the feedback has been updated).
The coder also claims he gave over the source code, JG claims he didn't get it. Someone's not telling the truth. If the coder could prove the source code was sent it could help answer that question I think.
As for the "retaliatory tidle" of distrusting of dkbit98, it's because JG understandably doesn't trust the feedback that was left. It's not really retaliatory, just reactionary.