Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.
Yes it is not a big deal. Because it would be a lie if a crypto guy says he does not use Binance. Now, use Binance means KYC. To operate, platforms must follow laws and regulations locally so even companies can not reject KYC request from governments. As users, we can not reject if governments go with KYC.
It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?
It is just a little panic and noise when something is changed in ToS and policy. You know I think in future, more KYC will be required on centralized platforms. We will not be able to avoid it forever. Like Binance, they were KYC free but now it is mandatory.
Level 1 KYC is not the end of anything. So I don't have big issue with level 1 KYC at Roobet. It is like if you love Binance, you will do KYC there. The same if you love Roobet, you will do KYC on Roobet.
Is it good or better if you do level 1 KYC on Roobet and continue to bet and get paid there or you move to another KYC-free gambling site but in the end, they turn to be scam?