generally don't require KYC verification
So the "KYC-free" claim is misleading

some check if the coins are tainted
Can you share how they check that? And list the exchanges in
[Blacklist] of unreliable, 'taint proclaiming' Bitcoin services / exchanges?
Taint doesn't exist! Allow me to quote myself:
I've seen several posts lately from people willing to treat Bitcoin as non-fungible because they believe some coins are "tainted".
I'd say this is a severe threat to Bitcoin, and I wouldn't be surprised if governments use this because they can't stop Bitcoin in any other way. If people believe Bitcoin is "tainted", they won't accept it anymore. "We" should really inform people not to fall for this.
Nobody would reject a dollar bill because it has previously been used in a crime, despite the fact that
85 to 90% contains traces of cocaine. Claiming Bitcoin isn't fungible is just plain stupid.
This never happened to any of my users and in the case of exchanges that have a reputation of doing so in the past there's a red warning on OrangeFren.com.
That's something

But better to avoid them entirely. The notion of "taint" is very bad for Bitcoin.
our compensation maxes out at 10%
I didn't catch that when you wrote "compensate our users", but after checking the meaning of the word, it turns out "compensate" doesn't mean what I thought it would.
There's a flaw in your
Untraceable Bitcoin with Monero: the exchange you use knows exactly which Bitcoin addresses belong to your IP address if you're not using different Tor identities.
Your
Disclaim affiliation is genius:
