Re: 🦉 Owl.games 🦉 Web 3.0 Crypto Casino & Sportsbook

Lessons learned that we should always charge bankroll deposit for this kind of risks if we were to provide similar service again.

This is a very valuable lesson for you to verify everything carefully otherwise it is very possible that scammers will use your software and it will seriously damage your reputation.
I see you're re-opening the signature campaign that was paused before, congratulations, I hope this can brings good things to your Casino.

I think SandBoxCasino is a scam and owlGames has allowed the casino to operate using its company name (Cyber Galaxy B.V.). OwlGames seems to have complete control of the back-end, but claims they don’t handle the casino’s wallet. SandBoxCasino has been completely unresponsive since their last and final statement on CasinoGuru that they were not paying me because I violated their terms by using a VPN, despite sandboxcasino openly stating it was acceptable in bitcointalk and LCB forums.

It’s clear SandBoxCasino has no intention of ever paying me, despite owlGames getting involved. OwlGames needs to take responsibility and pay me the $127,000.

Please complete your kyc first as we have seen you accessed your account y'day on Aug 16th but haven't submitted anything.

If we want us to back up your case you should submit the KYC within 2 weeks. And before you complete the KYC you have NO right to intentionally accuse us for not being act on your case.

You are free to send licensor a complaint either on SandBOX or Owl.games. In fact we strongly suggest you do that instead of making wrong accusation on different websites. We have already asked you to show some respect as we have already stood out to help push SandBOX to fix your case, but if you keep posting these false and misleading claims we will have our lawyer team sue you and we will see you on court in Florida.

I doubt that he will submit the KYC since he knew that he will not gonna win this case that’s why he resort to the desperate move which is attacking both the casino at the same time rather than do some negotiations to clear his case. Only court will make this issue resolve because there’s already a case in both party here. This is the only way to resolve it unless you both decided to come up with a settlement to stop this inconvenience on both party.

In my opinion. Owl should be taken out of the picture because they already give a fact that they are not affiliated with to the Sandboxcasino which is the real involved. They just do there job as software provider to give comment about the software they provide that being questioned. This is a topic should be discussed only on Sandboxcasino because attacking Owl right now is already a spam and against the rule of the forum.

Yes, we have actually informed SandBOX that we want cancel the partnership but we are still in dicussion for a proper exit route for it. SandBOX is a liability to our reputation now and we endeavor to fix it.