Is that a written rule?
Which forum rule are you referring to?
I'm sorry, it's not written on the unofficial forum rules, but it's such kind like convention or unwritten rules where there's a similar or same case and got same punishment if they're did that.
It should vary from case to case. The alleged account is not hacked or sold account. Hacked or sold account deserves red paint.
How you can make sure the account is either changed hands due to family uses, hacked or sold? If only sold and hacked will get negative tag, they can easily say the account is used by his family even though the real truth the account was sold to a stranger.
I'm sure there was some doubt on your part after posting a negative tag on an account
Nope, I'm not doubt to leave negative feedback until I saw someone give positive feedback and give advice to me.
The account was 0/0/0 no trust rating, so in this case a neutral would be fine. It's a member account with no reputation or trust in the community so no potential harm to the community. If there was a large amount of positive trust and potential to scam a large amount of money, I might have a different opinion.
Somewhat I understand about your opinion, well I will change my feedback to neutral then.
Maybe if the account is gain enough reputation, I would consider to ask the community again because I've seen few users when already gain many positive feedback, they're become a scammer.