--snip--
But that's not the point, and I'm not debating whether the "taint" is even real or not. The fact is, with the Tornado sanction, the government showed that it WILL sanction a non-person entity, a program for mixing outputs, if they see that it is mixing "tainted" outputs. I believe WasabiWallet's trade off, is merely trying to avoid a sanction by blocking "tainted" outputs. "Taint" as defined by "them", they invented it. Taint doesn't actually exist in the blockchain.
You're going off-topic. What i asked was "what kind of protection user get from blacklist during CoinJoin?". But your response is about protection zkSNACKs/Wasabi team could get.
Off-topic? Do we actually need to establish the fact that WasabiWallet's pool = also its users? I'm sorry, I thought you already understood that, and that we're on the same page in that matter. But anyway, whether right or wrong, whether you agree or disagree, the point is nopara37 accepted the trade off, and users also have a choice if the want to accept the trade off. Because anyone can use another mixer that doesn't blacklist outputs, or another team can run another coordinator that doesn't blacklist outputs.