The trick is, from that list of three positions, you can only have two. You can join a bounty with a cool manager that escrows funds (for example julerz12), but such bounties have unlimited amount of participants and in the end you get $1-5. Of course the amount might change if the price gets pumped, but no one usually hold bounty rewards for such a long time and prefer to dump them.
Bounty allocation is a tricky thing. Often we see $50-100k in project tokens. A lot of hunters see $50-100k, while more experience understand that this amount can be anything. Projects can randomly set tokens value, and often that price isnt the same we see during trades. Projects value their tokens much higher than real price. These $50-100k in reality are several thousands only.
Escrowed not guarantee with bounty participants get enough reward when bounty campaign ending, last bounty managed by Julerz all participants reward received under $1 like on Trophy bounty campaign. What ever reason reward values not depending on Bounty Manger actually he need and find promoting with potential project altcoin. But I prefer choose with his bounty payment with stable coin like Moonbet, although price drop but have chance back to higher price again than Trophy coins still dump and reward received still under $1.
Current bounty problem is - there are no potential projects nowadays. All of them offer one and the same ideas but in different wrapping. And I know that escrowing bounty reward is not a guarantee of good reward, but with julerz12, this is at least an insurance that you receive something. I think you agree that $1 is still better than $0. Who knows what will happen with those $1 worth tokens in half a year or a year. I dont participate in bounties to immediately sell rewards. $1 wont make me poor or rich, that is why I hold.