Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin’s longest-serving Lead Maintainer calls it quits, names no successor
by
DooMAD
on 20/08/2022, 18:48:05 UTC
realise consensus is about agreement of the majority

You are not in the majority you raving fruitloop.  You are a lone wingnut.


stop telling people that they need to fork off if they have a proposal outside of CORES roadmap

I tell people to fork off if their ideas are moronic, like yours.  And if you want examples:

stop letting the devs put cludgy code into bitcoin that causes a 4x of tx fee's, stop the devs from removal of old fee formulae, then insist the devs put in cleaner stuff that actually helps make bitcoin more useful day to day(on the bitcoin network),

This would cause a contentious hardfork you ignorant dumbfuck.  So yes, please fork off.

if the rule was actually 4m of proper maxblocksize rule without the cludgy math, then more transactions could be allowed
best estimates of average blocksize is 1.3mb

This would cause a contentious hardfork you ignorant dumbfuck.  So yes, please fork off.

if they remove the cludgy 'witness scale factor" bad math. and allowed say 2mb real byte tx utility
bitcoin can go to $1.6m for a $2 (250byte average tx)

This would cause a contentious hardfork you ignorant dumbfuck.  So yes, please fork off.

so remove the cludgy code that still insists portions of data stick in a redundant 1mb space. and actually utilise the 4mb space to allow 4x transaction capacity compared to 1mb

This would cause a contentious hardfork you ignorant dumbfuck.  So yes, please fork off.

Stop pretending you want consensus when what you want is a divisive hardfork and a split community.