I have seen the spreadsheet and can confirm that he was accepted in the signature campaign.
I personally wouldn't let him be part of altcoin signature campaign let alone BTC campaign. That @tomos81 is an utter gambling board shitposter, mostly writing about stuff that he obviously knows nothing about.
I've said that one can change quickly when they need money
[remember this one], but one can always doubt that accounts change hands regardless of whether they are sold or hacked. You can tag them with evidence, but I'm not going to pull out a gun quickly until I have valid evidence. You know? i have to get lot of valid evidence before tagging another user as guilty and i mostly do it myself instead of having a DT member investigate it. I've gained some valuable experience before, so maybe I'll be little cautious.
What has to happen for someone to regress in terms of English as it happened with @tomos81? People usually get better and here we have the opposite. Just compare his post history before he woke up few months ago and now and you will see the difference. To be fair, person that was behind this account up until 2018 obviously didn't care much about punctuation etc but his English was obviously better than what it is now.
@Crypt0S0ul I think that you are definitely unto something here and for now I am leaving neutral feedback that might change to negative in the future.