Well, I have a few questions about exposing some old accounts that look like they changed hands. I've exposed two accounts, and I believe there are a few more accounts around us. We don't notice them because they don't want to contribute anything to this forum except gambling discussion. Only they want money, so they only post on gambling discussions.

No 1. Should I expose accounts that already have negative feedback for a different reason? For example, An Account changed hands and participated in the 1xBet Signature campaign. Due to this, the account already got tagged. Does it worth creating another thread and proving that the account changed hands? Since the account doesn't care about reputation and participated in the 1xBet campaign, and already got tagged. People unlikely to trust them and I don't think people will do any deals with them. So, It's a waste of time. Still, I am looking forward to community feedback.

No 2. I believe some accounts changed hands a long time ago (About two-three years ago). Right now, Those accounts are managed by shit posters, and most of them are not fluent in English. They were not exposed because either no one noticed or maybe didn't have proper evidence to prove the claim. I had created two threads before and added a Question mark (?) on the title. I don't want to judge them myself. Instead, I will present them to the community, and you guys have to consider them based on my information. Now, The question is; Should I expose those accounts that seem to have changed hands two-three years ago?

Regards!