Based on "them", and "their rules". If you were truly reading my posts, you would truly get the context of my posts.
Gonna write a truly satisfactory response.
You would be technically correct, but "they" didn't care about that when "they" sanctioned Tornado Cash.
I'm more than that: There's absolutely no sign from governments and AML services that a Wasabi CoinJoin is the holly grail of bitcoin outputs. Just because they've hired
one chain analysis company to tell them which outputs they've analyzed completely shadily and non-transparently, and have reached the conclusion that are likely, according to their undisclosed measures, to be suspicious, it doesn't mean the rest of the world thinks likewise.
What would happen to all of those outputs that went through Tornado Cash?
I honestly don't know how it works, don't know how reliable that was, and neither how they identify that the outputs come from Tornado Cash. I have never used Ethereum.
WasabiWallet took the decision to block outputs used in "illegal transactions" as defined by "them", as a way to avoid "them" from sanctioning Wasabi.
I'm afraid they'll just block
lots of transactions, some of which are going to be "illegal", and leave it there. You can't know for sure they've avoided sanctioning, but they're doing fine so far by bootlicking the authorities' beloved analysis company.
It's the user's choice if he/she wants to take the trade off of using Wasabi, or not.
Ugh. Tradeoffs again.