due to instability on bigger chip i'd rather read table for short summary.
I can do that:
(sorry, I used Dutch date format)
I also made a 30 days running average, that should smoothen out the graphs:
(again: Dutch date format)
Full data
As far as I know there are no false positives or negatives in my data.
Now i wonder if there's rare occurrence someone accidentally mimic chip behavior. For example, user use one-time address practice and withdraw exactly 0.001BTC * 2^NAs far as I know there are no false positives or negatives in my data.
Do not you think the amount 0.001 or 0.002 could be so popular that connecting it with chipmixer transfer is a bit risky? Or course we may say it is a candidate because that amount was used, but I think we may have many many uncorrelated transactions.
What do you mean by "risky"? I didn't mean to claim how many of those addresses are related to ChipMixer, but that's the beauty of chips: anyone can create them.Quote
How about source addresses, any duplicates?
I didn't check source addresses, but I've seen many chips get funded at once in one transaction.