What I don't understand franky: first you say we can use something that enhances our privacy but isn't called a mixer.
there are other ways not defined as mixers, other ways to create new things not described or promoted as mixers/privacy enhancing tools to meander through to make it tougher to be linked.
but mixers specifically and anything described as privacy enhancing will get you watched which makes the fail their purpose
But then you say that any type of obfuscation is forbidden.
the FATF (financial action task force) mentions:
anonymity-enhancing technologies or mechanisms
including but not limited to:
AECs, mixers, tumblers, privacy wallets
and other technologies that obfuscate the identity of the sender, recipient, holder,
or beneficial owner
(aec) anonymity enhanced currencies
anonymity enhancing tools and service
and yep wait for it look at what its describing:
the use of embedded layering or other scaling solutions
virtual-to-virtual layering schemes that attempt to further obfuscate transactions in a comparatively easy, cheap, and secure manner.
if you care about your privacy its in your best interest to do your own research and not play ignorant cry baby when someone tells you the harsh truth.
dont cry about me being harsh.. instead think about the reality of life and facts. do your own research and realise what happens in the real world outside the utopian dreams you want to tell each other.
I'll ignore all the rambling and capslock-shouting and ask: what do you recommend, then? What were the findings of your research that let people use their money freely without being flagged criminals?
Did your research show that there is no such way and that we're forced to accept being surveilled nonstop?