if you want to do something . dont use something thats promoted as the thing that is regulated
[...]
however by using things that are "property right protection" tools
property rights is a higher law that supersedes any fantasy privacy you think you are entitled to. yep property right protection actually does protect you and gives you better rights
property rights protection is about allowing you to do as you please with your assets unencumbered by regulators. unless they can prove criminal activity
[...]
use something else thats not advertised as "privacy enhanced"(LN/monero/liquid, etc)
mixers tumblers, non compliant VASPs, etc
invent new tools that are described differently
So if I built a copy of ChipMixer's website and service but just
call it 'not privacy enhancing UTXO exchange service' or 'Chip property right protection tool 9000', then it's fine?
Or take Lightning / off-chaining: its main advantage is scaling: faster and cheaper transactions. If we stop saying that it
also can improve privacy, it's good in your eyes?
What if I fork Wasabi 1.0, spin up my new coordinator and call it 'worlds first non-privacy-enhancing CoinJoin coordinator'?
Basically:
[1] Build a privacy tool
[2] Don't say it improves privacy
[3] Profit?
I'm not sure this is how stuff works...